Thursday, February 25, 2021

Marvel News & Notes


Some interesting news about The Eternals was dropped by K. C. Walsh (GWW):
I heard Gemma Chan [Sersi] was a pain to work with on Eternals, so much so, Feige reduced her role in future plans and changed the ending to give Madden [Ikaris] a larger role, also heard other characters are introduced
This is not at all the kind of thing Walsh would make up--he's someone inclined to be supportive of Chan--so I believe he was told this (he's deleted the Tweet, but left others related to it--I suspect Murphy (who he'd already given this information too) and/or others in his circle told him to shut-up for fear of losing their access--this is not information Marvel wants public. As expected, in response to this there are now people talking about how great Chan was on-set. I see two possibilities: a source Walsh trusted set him up, which is hard to imagine, or this is true, but for obvious reasons Marvel doesn't want it out there. It will be interesting to see if Walsh feels pressured enough to offer up a mea culpa to maintain his access--we shall see--but don't expect this to be confirmed until years later (if ever). I'm also not expecting other scoopers to mention it, but if they do expect them to mouth the company line.


Assuming the above is true, let's consider what it means. I've pointed out before how risky it was to lean the film on Gemma Chan and Kit Harrington (a risk Marvel mitigated by including a billion supporting characters), but particularly with Chan because unlike Harrington, casual fans have no idea who she is. Clearly the hope was that Chan could pull off what we saw with Chris Pratt in Guardians, but I never anticipated her struggle would be on-set drama (when was the last time that happened in the MCU?). With an ensemble cast, transitioning away from her is very easy. I'm less clear on what Walsh means by 'other characters are introduced'--Eternals is already overcrowded, so how much time do you have for more intros? Perhaps he's talking about post-credit entries or the future of those taking Sersi's place in future plans.


Speaking of The Eternals, I've been seeing Marvel fans proclaiming the movie is the greatest thing ever made, but was unclear where the hyperbole was coming from given that we've seen nothing and director Chloe Zhao has made only three art films no one has seen. It turns out the hyperbole is from a Tweet via Erick Weber, editor-in-chief of Awards Ace (among other things), who said on Feb.22:
Just got a text from a high-level source who tells me ChloƩ Zhao "crushed" The Eternals & Marvel is "almost in disbelief" about what they have on their hands
Is Weber known for Marvel info? Not to my knowledge. Would he put this out just to hype the film for Disney? I have no reason to think so. However, before we put on our party hats, internal faith in an IP doesn't always work out--Batman v Superman received a standing ovation from WB execs before it released (cf) and it's standard procedure for studios to talk about how great something is prior to release (it's part of the hype). Is this a positive sign? Yes and I'd like it to be true. Does it alleviate my concerns? Not yet--let's see a trailer first.


We have a Reddit leak for WandaVision that was verified by mods. The Redditor echoes the 4chan leak from a few days ago, although the poster splits things between 'verified' and 'unverified', with most of the information being in the latter category (when the two posts are the same I've coloured them in green; my comments are in pink):

VERIFIED LEAKS
  • I've seen images of White Vision, as well as Vision himself being created in the hex. [The 4chan post never specified a white Vision, but I think having two opposed Visions is close enough]
  • White Vision is in some sort of chamber with a horizontal blue-ish light. Everything has a blue-ish cool tint, honestly. He seems to be asleep / deactivated. He is, indeed, totally white.
  • Vision's creation involves a bunch of magical orange lines, like beams. There's a door right behind him in the image I have, and his (left?) arm is outstretched. It basically seems to be the precursor of what we've seen in the trailers. His pose is very similar. [He means when an in-colour Wanda meets a black and white Vision]
UNVERIFIED
  • It shows how Agatha got her power.
  • Agatha and Wanda see Wanda's past in front of them. [Supposed leaked stills show something of this]
  • Wanda and Pietro as children watched old sitcom VHS tapes on TV. [ibid]
  • Suddenly a bomb comes! Wanda and Pietro hide under the bed.
  • It shows how Wanda got her power. [We've seen this scene in trailers repeatedly]
  • Wanda and Vision talk before their Civil War scene. [I think he means Infinity War because of supposed leaked stills that came out this week]
  • Wanda goes to the SWORD base and meets Tyler Hayward. She sees Vision's body torn apart. [We've seen parts of this in the show and trailers]
  • She leaves the base without the body, goes to Westview, and cries. BOOM. The hex appears.
  • Agatha got Wanda's child [children]. She's choking them with a pink smoky rope thing in the street.
  • The mid-credits scene is Hayward activating White Vision. [If that's correct, it means the entire episode takes place in less than a day of real time]
There's no reason to question the verified elements as they have all the messy specifics of something the poster has seen with their own eyes. The rest seems like speculation informed by the actual spoilers. We will get two Visions in the show, which is interesting, although the show itself is hardly spoiled--it doesn't clarify Agatha's motives, why Wanda went to Westview, or why the hex occurred there (among other things).


Amidst the reveal of Spider-Man 3's title, No Way Home, came some interesting news from Tom Holland:
The way I understand it is that agreement between the two studios has already happened. I don’t think that they’re going to run into the same troubles that they did as we were going into… was it ‘Spider-Man 2’? ‘Far from Home’ had come out and then the whole thing happened between Sony and Marvel. I think the two studios have worked that out, and I don’t think that that will be a problem in the future. That said, I’m just the actor and I was a part of a few phone calls during that process, but I think they love working with each other, I think they found a way in which it can be beneficial for both studios, and I’m just kind of like a kid in the middle of it, between two parents during an argument (laughs).
When the new deal between Sony and Marvel was announced in 2020 it was for one more MCU-produced Sony film (aka Spider-Man 3) plus an MCU appearance. Many are taking Holland's comments to mean an extension has already been negotiated between the two companies, but while this is indicative, I wouldn't take it as confirmation.

Redditor put out a purported scoop that Spider-Punk and Spider-Man 2099 will appear in Spider-Man 3. The poster knows a guy and despite not being able to verify things with the mods, was allowed to leave the post up without comments--this is not normal procedure and presumably the poster is friends with a mod/s. That aside, if true these would have to be cameos--the cast is too bloated for anything else--but I'm familiar with neither and researching them hasn't added any excitement.


Another tidbit from Feige is that there are currently no plans for R-rated IP that are currently in development besides Deadpool 3. While this isn't a big surprise (Marvel comics themselves are PG), just two months ago in a now-deleted article, Sutton claimed Blade would lead into a number of R-rated supernatural shows. If Blade isn't R-rated, it's hardly the proper lead-in, and if it isn't R-rated, why would related supernatural shows be? This looks debunked to me.


I've long thought the primary purpose of introducing the Multiverse was that it offered an opportunity for the MCU to give itself a 'Get Out of Jail, Free' card. With it, you can not only bring in characters from non-canon IP, but you can also bring back dead characters (through other iterations). Its introduction makes this option perpetually available and its a great way to either fix things that aren't working or simply experiment (it's also an odor-remover if Sony films start to bomb).


LotLB, in conjunction with Lauder from Small Screen, talked shop and I'm glad to see Tim doing this--whatever you think of him, I find him entertaining--a passionate guy with a good sense of humour. I think the usual LotLB crew is more engaging, but none of his buddies can offer scoops. That said, Lauder did not have any new info to offer, simply repeating the rumour of a Captain America 4 with Chris Evans (cf), along with Ultron having something to do with Hayward in WandaVision (cf).


I don't know what's going to happen to Mikey Sutton if his Agents of SHIELD rumours go unfulfilled. Innocuous comments from Feige prompted this response (Mikey accidentally missed mentioning one of the shows referenced, specifically Daredevil). I admire his faith, but if he's wrong he's pushed this so hard it will reflect poorly on him. Mikey was right about Charlie Cox appearing (something I was wrong about), but I think how he's presenting what will happen to AoS is beyond the pale. Here are the key quotes, starting with Feige (direct quotes are in quotes):
"I think there are legions of Agents of SHIELD fans and Daredevil fans and Jessica Jones fans and Luke Cage fans. There’s a very big fanbase for those shows." ... Feige indicates that some of the stories you see about characters they can use again from the previous TV shows are true, some are not, but they would be open to opportunities depending on the scenario. ... "There are often rumors that are true and there are often rumors that are not. It was great fun to have Clark Gregg come back to the MCU in Captain Marvel… Everything else, we’ll just have to see."
Here's Sutton's response:
First of all, he singled out Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. as among the Marvel TV series with a “very big fanbase.” The other programs he mentioned were Jessica Jones and Luke Cage. This wasn’t random. He never spills the beans until he’s ready. … The substantial followings he described provide a reason for Disney to resurrect those shows. … Read between the lines. Those are programs that Marvel Studios is planning on bringing back. Regarding Marvel’s AoS specifically, the Marvel Studios producer admitted that “There are often rumors that are true.” … Furthermore, many have claimed that they don’t even exist in the MCU. Kevin Feige shot those down. He said that it depends on the situation; some of it will be kept in continuity while others will not.
There are a number of prevarications here (Feige did not 'single out' AoS). One of the immediate issues for Sutton's theory about these comments is that Feige did not mention The Punisher or Iron Fist, and he's said both are coming back (with Iron Fist re-cast, cf and cf)--so if Feige only mentioned those shows that are coming back, RIP those scoops. That aside, it takes special pleading to associate the huge fanbase for Netflix's Daredevil with the anemic AoS fanbase--this isn't a matter of debate as I went over the numbers. We know the list of shows Feige provided were off-the-cuff because of the absence of the aforementioned two along with Agent CarterThe Runaways, Cloak & Dagger, and Hellstrom. Does Feige excluding a show he executive produced (Carter) mean it's on the scrapheap? I don't think anyone believes he'd sleight his own work even if that was the case, but that's the implication of Sutton's argument. Two more prevarications: Feige doesn't use the word "continuity" in any quote I've seen--there's a huge difference between using characters from past IP and canonizing their continuity within the main MCU (we aren't talking about Multiverse continuity); secondly, Feige did not 'shoot down' the idea that AoS isn't part of continuity. I believe this is a rare case where Sutton's love for a show is overwhelming his ability to be objective--he's suffering from confirmation bias and I don't know what he'll do if it all falls apart.

I've said this before: Marvel could borrow characters from AoS via the Multiverse, but what I object to is the idea that the shows will have their canon be within the prime MCU universe. I see no benefit in doing so--it reduces opportunities rather than multiplies them.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Marvel News & Notes


Justin Kroll
 (Deadline) is trying to extinguish the Jennifer Lawrence flames:
All I’m gonna say is this, Marvel just started meeting with writers on FANTASTIC FOUR, there is no script and it will be awhile before this film starts shooting
This cools the idea considerably. There are two things to note here: 1) He doesn't deny the casting (which suggests he doesn't absolutely know it hasn't happened)--Blade cast its star without writers or a director, so there is precedence for Marvel to cast a lead prior to a script, 2) It's difficult to imagine sending Lawrence down to Australia for filming when there's no script to film. Kroll's reporting makes it likely that The Daily Telegraph's and The Daily Mail's stories are wrong, at least as described. This doesn't mean Lawrence isn't or couldn't be cast in the film (as, indeed, Kroll does not say that), simply that these stories can't be taken as confirmation of the fact.


We've learned WandaVision episode eight is 47 minutes (that would include credits), which leaves 60 for the finale (assuming the show is exactly six hours long). This scoop comes from Reddit, but scoopers haven't given it proper credit (this kind of thing drives me nuts). Incidentally, a friend of mine told me the Agatha song is a Modern Family nod, which I was unaware of (that doesn't make it any more effective, but does make it more thematically appropriate).

Daniel says Wanda will be the main MCU focus for Phase Four. It's difficult to tell from his simple comment what, if anything, he's saying beyond what's public knowledge: we know she's in Doctor Strange 2 and Spider-Man 3, and that her show is the lead-in and trigger for Multiverse shenanigan's. Does Daniel mean the Multiverse itself as the general element? If so, that's not news. This is only news if he means Wanda will appear in other IP.

We have yet another supposed 4chan leak (from the context the poster is implying he was in a test audience viewing):
  • Wanda did not steal Vision's body. She left it there when she saw what had been done to him. [This is a unique idea, as is the Vision storyline described here]
  • Hayward didn't know there was another Vision until arriving outside of Westview. He sees taking Westview Vision as an opportunity to obtain another one for Cataract.
  • Westview Vision is from an alternate reality. Agnes [Agatha] pushes Wanda to try and bring him back to life after seeing him in pieces at the Sword base but she ends up pulling one from an alternate reality. [This would explain why he doesn't remember anything pre-Westview]
  • Pietro is Peter from the X-Men films. Wanda at one point in episode 5 tried to bring back Pietro but she failed to do so. What she did do is bring over Peter from the FOX universe, and Agnes [Agatha] seized the moment to have him act in a way she wanted him to as to temper Wanda.
  • Vision does wake up Peter before the big fight but there isn't much time for catching up before everything goes crazy. It seems he knows Agatha is the threat as he knows she hexed him.
  • Hayward isn't anyone else in disguise, just a paranoid individual. When he said to prepare for launch last episode, he was talking about MCU Vision under the Cataract program. He's "white" Vision. Both Visions fight at the end and Westview Vision sacrifices himself to destroy them both. [Having Vision as the threat would add weight to Hayward's plans]
  • Dr Strange does show up at the end in the heat of the battle. After Westview Vision is killed along with his mind stone, Strange reiterates the concepts The Ancient One brought up in Endgame regarding if a mind stone is not brought to it's proper moment in time, chaos will ensue. I assume this is what leads into Multiverse of Madness.
  • Monica's contact was just that lady. They're Skrulls but idk if it was the daughter of Talos.
  • There is another classic Quicksilver scene but it doesn't seem as long as the 2nd one. "Sweet dreams" is what was noted as being played but idk if this was temporary. [If Evans is Quicksilver there's no point in bringing him back without another iconic scene like that]
  • Wanda and Agatha duke it out. The kids just hide for the most part but do help a little bit. Agatha does get away. It's not explicitly said that she's Nightmare but she does have abilities he would seem to have. Mephisto isn't seen or mentioned.
  • Strange takes Wanda, her kids, and Peter in under his hospitality. A memorial for Vision is built within Westview.
  • I have zero clue who Bettany is talking about as far as the actor he looks up to. I assume it was added later or not included in what I saw. So it's probably a very small role or cameo.
  • Same with post credit scenes. I assume there are but I did not see any
It's 4chan, so this is most likely fan fiction, but it's restrained and plausible--nothing stands out as improbable or already debunked.


We have what looks like more confirmation of Jeremy Conrad's last scoop (albeit, he was speculating), as a casting call for a court scene has leaked that will film in a couple of weeks (there was a rumour Charlie Cox had finished shooting a month ago, but I don't think it was credible). Speaking of Conrad, after almost three months of silence he posted on his site again (about DC this time)--I'm not sure if he'll attempt a comeback or not--the scooper community hates him, he no longer has an inside source (his Eternals scoop), and he doesn't have ties to other options like Sutton does (who, for different reasons, is also hated by that community)--time will tell.


We received confirmation that Adepero Oduye is playing Sarah Wilson, Falcon's sister. Oduye was spotted on set way back in November of 2019, but at the time there was debate over whether she was his sister or girlfriend Leila Taylor (Sarah felt like the correct guess). This doesn't carry us very far, as there's little indication that Sarah is a major part of the show (simply backstory and character building for Sam). As I've been saying for awhile, this really does seem like The Falcon Show, but with Bucky shoved in for marketing purposes. A lot of commentary about the show compares it to 80s buddy cop films Lethal Weapon and 48 Hours, but in both of those films there was an age/experience dynamic between the pair and while Bucky is technically older than Sam, I'm not sure he can take on the same role--it will be interesting to see how similar the show tries to be in that respect.


We briefly had one of the most baffling scoops I can recall from DisInsider Derek Cornell, who said Big Hero 6 characters are coming to the MCU. I barely knew what that was, but originally they were a Japanese superhero team born out of Alpha Flight that Marvel licensed out to IDW in 2019. The team originally included two Marvel characters I'm familiar with: Sunfire (briefly a member of the X-Men) and Silver Samurai, but both are disconnected from how the IP is now known. While never popular at Marvel (thus the IDW deal), it was successful as an animated film in 2014 (making almost double the box office of Into the Spider-Verse), which spawned three seasons of an animated series beginning in 2017. Cornell had no idea where they would appear, guessing Secret Invasion, Doctor Strange 2, or Agents of Atlas (the latter isn't confirmed). The day after this dropped Variety (Adam B. Vary) debunked it saying:
the “Big Hero 6” crew are not currently set to make their live-action debut within the Marvel Cinematic Universe ... Disney announced that Walt Disney Animation Studios was producing the TV series “Baymax!” for Disney Plus — suggesting Disney still sees value in further exploiting the animated feature. A different version of the same characters introduced by Marvel would inject the kind of consumer brand confusion that Disney has scrupulously avoided within its various divisions. There is always the possibility that Marvel Studios could turn to “Big Hero 6” in the future
What Variety confirmed is there aren't current plans for them to appear, with the rest of the article being his surmise (I agree with Vary about the problems of brand confusion). In response to this, DisInsider head Skyler Shuler answered ambiguously "I'm definitely not worried about [the debunking]"--meaning what? Is he taking the lose or does he still believe Cornell's scoop? The only prior Cornell scoops I've covered he was wrong both times: Hailee Steinfeld wasn't going to be Kate Bishop and Travis Knight was approached to direct Guardians 3 (cf). DisInsider isn't really the place for MCU scoops (Shuler, for instance, believed the Captain Marvel directors would direct Ms. Marvel, cf), so I'll happily side with Variety.


One thing I should briefly go over that I've alluded too in discussing WandaVision is my general distaste for sitcoms. I don't dislike all sitcoms--a few work for me--but the ones the show has been inspired by are not to my taste at all. Given that, I'm not the intended audience for that style of humour and, at least judging by the mixed reactions to the first three episodes of WandaVision, neither are most MCU fans. I'm curious how or if this will impact She-Hulk, which will be a straightforward sitcom. Showrunner Jessica Gao's claim to fame is being a writer for season three of Rick and Morty--something laudable--but the rest of her credits are a mixed bag and her immediate material afterwards (a sitcom for Disney-owned ABC) went nowhere. Feige is very hands off his projects, so it will be interesting to see if Gao can actually make it work.


We know one of the reasons Sam Raimi was picked to direct Doctor Strange 2 was his ability to bring back actors from the Sony Spider-Man IP. There's a possibility that the casting of Oscar Isaac as Moon Knight fulfilled a similar purpose, as Ethan Hawke makes it clear his involvement in Moon Knight was key to signing on for it.


Sutton put out a rambling post about an upcoming Daredevil show with Cox as the star. Within it he says that Marvel wants Vincent D'Onofrio back as Kingpin and is considering using the following villains: Bullseye (despite appearing in both the Fox film and the Netflix show), Mister Fear (there have been four versions), Stilt-Man, and Jester (a classic if minor villain for the IP). If Marvel wants to make a Daredevil show with Cox, it would be incumbent on them to do it sooner than later (to capitalize on the goodwill he still has, as well as to get the most use out of him while he's still young enough to perform the role). With that said, it's still unclear if Cox's appearance in Spider-Man 3 is a glorified easter egg before a reboot or something else.


For those of you with good memories you may recall that as far back as the summer of 2019, LotLB (TBK) claimed Marvel was interested in using characters from Western-styled comics in the MCU. Sutton took up the idea, but it hasn't come up in a year or so. We finally have resonance for it, as one of Murphy's writers has written to advocate for such a thing (the article is unremarkable, so I won't link it here). I don't think articles like this are an accident--there's no obvious reason to speculate about such a thing now, so it has me wondering if Murphy has heard something echoing the old TBK idea, but without proper confirmation he's farming it off to a lesser writer. It's just speculation on my part, but if there was solid info Murphy (or Hill) would have written about it. Food for thought. 


A bit of trivia that's going to matter mostly to me, but related to MCU coverage. I did not realize that Murphy writer Joseph Aberl is an editor at MCU Exchange. This isn't a big surprise, since Editor-in-Chief Charles Villanueva is buddies with Murphy and also writes for his site. More interesting is that Pierre Chanliau--former Reddit mod and writer for The Direct--is also an editor at MCU Exchange. This gives you an idea of how small the world of MCU fan writers is and why they tend to all have the same opinions.


Various things can nudge me down memory lane and Andy Signore's involvement with Fandom Wire reconnected me with his post-Screen Junkies buddy, Jody of Jody's Corner (a YT channel). I'm bringing up Jody in reference to the Snyder Cut because of claims he's made, but we need a little background for those unfamiliar with him. I'm hardly an expert, but I ran into Jody's channel in 2017 or so, around its peak popularity. I was not by any means a regular viewer, I just noted his various reactions and reviews. He became well known enough to appear on Collider's Heroes in 2018 (my favourite video of his remains this one, however). He is, or has become, a tornado of drama and outside Signore seems to have lost whatever goodwill he had within the fandom (in part for his endless war against Ray Fisher). When I first encountered him he was a hardcore DC fanboy (you can still watch his incoherent Infinity War review). Jody talks incessantly about how 'real' he is, but his Wonder Woman 1984 review illustrates the limitations of that.

Why is Jody stirring up drama with DC? Specifically he's at war with Snyder Cut fans--I don't know what started it, but the two sides have attacked each other for a long time. Why should we care? Because Jody claims he had an inside source at WB that gave him the scoop over what was happening with Zack Snyder during all the turmoil surrounding Justice League. In a long, rambling video he talks about what he was told. Jody's claim is that he was on-set at WB in 2017 or 2018 and talked to still photographer Clay Enos (someone apparently very close to Snyder). Enos told him the following: Snyder had a vendetta against those who ousted him at WB and recruited Ray Fisher (and possibly others) to stir things up to get revenge on them. We know that Jody was on a WB set at that time and he probably did talk to Enos, but we only have his word for it (Enos is unlikely to confirm it). This makes Jody's comments hearsay and he has an axe to grind--what can we make of it?

The problem I have with the idea, for the sake of argument accepting the basic premise that what Jody is reporting is true, is the timing. Jody's theory is that Ray Fisher's accusations (in July) were motivated by the Black Lives Matter movement--timed for maximum effect. The problem with that idea is if he's a proxy for Snyder, the director had already won by that point--AT&T gave the greenlight for the Snyder Cut in May. The only way to buy into this idea is that revenge matters more to Snyder than anything else and that Fisher wasn't bright enough to understand Zack couldn't guarantee him a Cyborg film (that's Jody's claim--that a film was dangled as bait for Ray), but revenge on who? It's very hard to parse Ray's accusations as part of a Machiavellian scheme, because most of the figures involved in Justice League already had seen their careers suffer:
  • Jon Berg was fired in January, 2018, after Justice League bombed
  • Geoff Johns lost his position controlling the DCEU as a consequence of Justice League bombing
  • Joss Whedon lost Batgirl in February, 2018, after Justice League bombed
  • Kevin Tsujihara was ousted in March, 2019, as a consequence of being MeToo'd
  • Walter Hamada wasn't on the scene at WB until after Tsujihara was fired, so had nothing to do with Snyder's Justice League
Other execs at WB opposed the Snyder Cut, but Fisher hasn't attacked any of them specifically, so where is the vendetta? While Fisher's accusations pushed Whedon out of The Nevers, it's his former stars from Buffy and Angel that have sunk Whedon's career. I don't know if Jody's conversation with Enos happened as described, but the timeline doesn't match the stated conspiracy at all--as early as March, 2019, any 'revenge' Snyder wanted had already happened as a result of Justice League.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Saturday, February 20, 2021

Marvel News & Notes


After a solid month and a half of torrential amounts of MCU news, things slowed down this week. In the lead-up to episode seven of WandaVision not much dropped other than the episode length (38 minutes)--I assume this came out to debunk the rumour that the last three episodes would be longer (cf). If the show's total runtime includes its lengthy credits, it means the final two episodes will be longer (there's c.107 remaining of a six hour show, so less the credits that's about 45-minutes each). Can the show wrap-up successfully in that time? It depends on how good the payoff is. I expect the resolution to make sense, but will it be satisfying? Time will tell.

While I really enjoyed episode seven, it was a slight step down from six, which itself was down from five (the current peak for the series). Wanda's story was unusually middling (there wasn't enough weight to her unhappiness), while Monica's origin story continues to struggle (more about that below). Vision's arc was the highlight, as he learned the truth of his past from Darcy and shrugs off the binds of the WandaVision show-format. The Agatha Harkness reveal failed for me--the last thing I expected was a villain song straight out of Disney animation--it wrecked my immersion and I'm curious how others reacted to it--the tone was so cartoony it stripped away the threatening atmosphere. With Agatha admitting to killing the dog, redeeming her is going to be difficult (if, indeed, the show goes that way).

The big question to ask is: why did Agatha reveal not just herself but her deeds to Wanda? Presumably she feels like Wanda can do nothing to stop her at this point, but stop her from what? We don't know what Agatha's goals are, so the only feeling is uncertainty--she's an antagonist, but of what kind? We also learned that Evan Peters' character is her colleague or under her control (who he really is we don't know--some still believe he's the Fox Quicksilver, others do not--I lean towards the latter).

Monica's aerospace engineer tease resulted in nothing this episode (even the fanboys were disappointed)--either the person who assisted her is more meaningless than the Skrull kid from Captain Marvel, or the reveal has been pushed off to the final two episodes. This segues into the continuing issues with Monica's origin. There's no sense of danger when she re-enters the hex--nothing bad has happened to her from doing it (she's rewarded with super powers), so there's no tension to the scene. Lack of stakes has plagued Monica--getting powers while trying to help people isn't a bad premise, but the lack of consequences robs it of its potency (her speech to Wanda this episode is almost identical to what she told her in episode five). It's sad to say that Monica herself doesn't seem necessary for the story--any agent sucked into the hex could have performed her role, which is to say the fact that it's Monica hasn't been important. I think what the writers are trying to do is use the death of Maria Rambeau as the emotional connection between she and Wanda, but because Maria dies off screen and Monica never mourns for her, the impact isn't felt. Much of her story feels like it was dictated by Marvel execs rather than coming from the showrunner.

We're supposed to be concerned with Hayward's upcoming attack, but he's been so comically inept thus far it's impossible to feel worried. If Hayward's attack is effective, it's going to be incongruous with his portrayal. As I said in my review last time, the writers did not invest enough time in the SWORD B-plot and because of that, its antagonist is as threatening as a wet noodle. Why they gave Hayward no positive motivation to act as he does is baffling--all they needed was a line about how something happened to people close to him that's echoed by this situation (as in, superheroes causing damage, ala Zemo) and the groundwork is laid, but clearly the directive was to make him unsympathetic, which gives us a poorly conceived villain (you can only get away with a one-dimensional villain if they pose a threat to the hero, and even then it's not a good idea).

A question no one is asking: how has Jimmy Woo forgotten his missing person all this time? We still have no idea who it is, or why Woo would keep it to himself. Speaking of Woo, if you were to cut him from the show entirely, would it impact anything? The answer seems to be no--clearly Hayward wanted to send Monica to the hex regardless, so Woo is simply an excuse. Perhaps his neglected missing person will change that, but again the writers haven't made the effort to meaningfully integrate the specific character into the plot.

I thought the Agatha reveal could be a partial debunking of Murphy's source for the show (who seemed to say Agatha was Nightmare--an unlikely reveal after just having a reveal). However, a kind Redditor (who had more patience going through the poster's history than I did) combed through their claims and posted them. These are the ones for the show (I'll deal with the others below):
  • Evan Peters is playing Peter Maximoff from the Fox X-Men movies. His appearance is not a gag or a misdirect or a Mysterio-esque fakeout. He is not a villain.
  • Wanda finds out about mutants thanks to an unrevealed guest star.
  • The main villain is Nightmare.
  • Kathryn Hahn plays Nightmare in some way. A popular theory that the poster seems to believe is that Nightmare is controlling Agatha Harkness.
  • Wiccan and Speed are alive after Episode 7.
  • Wandavision will explain what's going on with the multiverse. It'll make more sense after the show.
What's weird about the poster's thoughts is why wouldn't Quicksilver (if he is from the Fox universe) be the one to reveal mutants to Wanda--he is a mutant and a surprise guest star. In terms of testing the veracity of what's left, we'll need to see Nightmare, have Agatha controlled by that character, and someone other than Quicksilver reveal mutants. The upcoming episodes also pose some issues for Murphy, as he predicted elements that seem unlikely given how this episode ended (Wiccan and Speed being bullied in high school--is there really time for the two to return to regular Westview hijinks when Hayward is supposed to attack that day?).

Speaking of WandaVision news, Paul Bettany revealed that we have not seen the actor he was looking forward to working with yet, so that mystery remains. For those who still have Magneto hopes, Ian McKellan is someone he has worked with, but he hasn't worked with Michael Fassbender. I think it's unlikely the character will appear (however much I'd enjoy it). He's acted with James McAvoy, incidentally, but not Patrick Stewart.

Sutton offered a theory rather than a scoop about what's happening in the show (based purely on comicbook nods): the Nexus commercial is related to the Nexus of All Realities (the gateway into the Multiverse), Jennifer Kale (who he believes is Dottie) is the only one who can open it, Man-Thing guards it (thus all the vines in the basement), and the book is The Tome of Zhered-Na; Kale can only use the Nexus if accompanied by a member of the Underworld, which he believes is Mephisto. This would make whoever is playing Mephisto the 'big reveal' and Dottie as a witch is possible, albeit its late in the game to introduce so many characters. Kale has come up in speculation before (originally with LotLB (TBK) back in September of 2019 as part of an R&D list); Man-Thing was originally part of Jeph Loeb's Hulu plans, but by October of 2019 both Sutton and Daniel claimed he'd appear in the MCU (Sutton has put both characters into Midnight Sons).

Unrelated, Sutton adds that AoS is canon and anything said to the contrary is ridiculous--the man dost protest too much, methinks. For Mikey's sake, here's where I go through the numbers of that show to illustrate how difficult it would be to enforce it upon MCU fans who ignored it in droves.


The Daily Telegraph is reporting that Jennifer Lawrence is going to Australia to film The Fantastic Four. Apparently she'll first shoot a series of some sort with Joel Edgerton, and then transition into Fantastic Four. This suggests we already have an (unannounced) writer for Fantastic Four--in fact, there must already be a script. Murphy's site accepts this as real and it's hard to imagine the Telegraph making it up. The obvious guess would be that she's playing Susan Storm, which (if true) would fit my idea of going younger than the usual fan casting of Emily Blunt (Lawrence turns 31 in August, Blunt turns 38 in a few days). This wouldn't necessarily eliminate John Krasinski as Reed Richards, as the character has always been older than Sue. My guess is rather than a race-swapped Johnny Storm, the MCU will go with a race-swapped Ben Grimm to diversify the team (avoiding copying the horrendous Fox film). [I should note, Sutton said there was interest in the actress yesterday, but that no talks had yet occurred.]


Hill has deduced that Arian Moayed has been cast in Spider-Man 3 as a detective. This lines up with the casting call Daniel put out recently for a male BIPOC detective. In a crowded cast this has to be a very minor role.

The aforementioned Redditor (above) had this to say about the film:
  • Spider-Man 3 is a Spider-Verse movie because of the events of Wandavision.
  • Tobey and Andrew will appear. Tom Holland lied about them not appearing.
  • Jamie Foxx as Electro is a different and fresh take on the character in the MCU timeline. This applies to other characters as well. It is explained with the multiverse.
None of these claims originate with the poster. Feige gave away the connection between the show and the film, the appearances of the other Spider-Men goes back to Sutton in May, and Foxx gave away who he'll play in a deleted post (Instagram I think).

Here are the final purported scoops from the poster:
  • Marvel is going to pick and choose who they like and multiverse them in however they want. Multiple X-Men are crossing over.
  • Sony is partially doing the multiverse stuff to give themselves more options. Disney can keep Holland, and Sony can keep making their own movies with different versions of characters while still having it make sense.
These are, again, not original scoops. The moment Evan Peters was revealed (cf) the approach became apparent (Charlie Cox simply adds fuel to the idea); the latter is a broadly held sentiment. As I said about a month ago (cf) when discussing the poster, I think they have real WandaVision inside information, but not anything else.


THR (Aaron Couch) reports that actress Laurel Marsden has been cast as Zoe Zimmer in Ms. Marvel. I don't know the actress or the character, but in researching it she was created for the third run of Ms. Marvel in 2014 by G. Willow Wilson; she's a French immigrant who is a lesbian schoolmate of Kamala's; she starts off as a bully, but then becomes a friend. She's had zero resonance outside the IP (literally no appearances outside Ms. Marvel runs), so unfortunately like the rest of the cast, isn't going to raise the temperature of anyone who isn't already a hardcore fan (keeping in mind some of those fans were already in an uproar about other casting). I have a lot of concerns for Ms. Marvel--it will be interesting to see how it's received.


Crazy Days and Nights claims Brie Larson is in Australia filming scenes for Thor 4. I mentioned before that I have no idea how credible the site is, but as ideas go it's plausible. Sutton has signal boosted the idea, but added no new information. Sutton's choices for signal boosting are interesting (this site, Small Screen, and Giant Freakin Robot)--these are not typical places for people to go, but perhaps its quid pro quo in that they've reported on him (Mikey is banned from Marvel Reddit sites and hated intensely by Daniel and his buddies).


Sutton posted a Heroes for Hire scoop, although he's not the first to have the idea. He's long predicted an Iron Fist show (cf) with Luke Cage appearing in other people's IP, but not this specific scenario. Here's what he says:
[Heroes for Hire] established the black guy/white guy buddy dynamic years before Hollywood took it to the bank in films like 1982’s 48 Hrs. and later the Lethal Weapon franchise. … Marvel Studios has been looking for ways to reboot them for Disney Plus. As usual, Marvel Studios looks to the past to see what worked in the comics. … From what I’ve heard, the plan is to follow the blueprint of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier on Disney Plus. That show is influenced by ’80s action movies. This will be of a similar flavor but with the added spice of ’70s martial arts and blaxploitation fare.
I've gone over the issues with Mike Colter's age--a show like this wouldn't appear for another couple of years, if not longer (following Sutton's own theories, it would post-date Shang-Chi 2, which isn't even on the schedule). How much longer can Colter keep Cage's physique? That aside, I've said repeatedly that Heroes for Hire is the only way we get Iron Fist back as a star (or co-star). Cage has a bit more cache as he can diversify other IP. I think the idea in general is credible, but I'm less sure that Sutton's version is correct.


Andy Signore says Coulson is coming back to the MCU along with Chloe Bennet's Quake in Secret Invasion. One way he differs from Sutton is that it's not a continuation of Agents of SHIELD, but something new entirely (almost certainly via the Multiverse). I'll remind you that Andy is not yet a verified scooper, so content from him has to be taken with grains of salt. With that said, is it possible select characters from AoS could show up? Yes--the Multiverse offers those opportunities. Certainly for Coulson, whose appearance in Captain Marvel was squandered, it would be a chance for the MCU to try and tap into what made him an appealing support character in Phase One (although, again, he's had a complete character arc, so what do you need him for?).

After Signore posted this, he followed it up by saying Daredevil (Charlie Cox) will also be on the show. If this is true, this is the first character appearing that's actually interesting--I've mentioned before that the whole Skrull-thing does nothing for me (neither do AoS characters, including Coulson). This is the what the show needs to draw in casuals--people aren't going to show up just for Nick Fury (which is why it's not the Nick Fury show--the same applied to War Machine--it's an Armor Wars show).


Daniel claims Marvel has had talks with actress Jessica Rothe for a role, but doesn't indicate what the soon-to-be 34-year old was approached for (he likely doesn't know). Visually she'd suit either as Susan Storm or Clea [Murphy says not the former], but if true it could be for almost anything (and not necessarily a major role). I'm completely unfamiliar with the actress, so have no strong reaction to the idea.


More Daniel rumours (grains of salt required):
  • Keanu Reeves still up for Ghost Rider [This seems to be an attempted rebuttal to Skylar Shuler]
  • AT&T doesn't care about the comics so will let that branch either die or sell it off [This isn't Marvel but I included it because I recognize the source of the rumour: Bleeding Cool and LotLB (TBK) reported the basic idea last February; the immediate impetus of this, however, seems to be a Bleeding Cool article from earlier this week; after I initially wrote this down Daniel shifted the comment from his rumour section to a his more 'verified' area]
  • Spider-Man will get a re-match vs Falcon and Bucky in a future project [I'm not sure their comedic fight in Civil War is begging for a re-match]

Sutton claims Sony is interested in Karl Urban for Kraven. This would be an excellent choice, although I'm not sure Urban wants to involve himself in the chaotic mess that is Marvel Sony (we know he can be picky about projects, as he refused to attach himself to Judge Dredd: Mega City One until he was happy with how he'd be included).

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Marvel News & Notes


Episode six has come and gone so let's go over it. According to Kevin Feige, this is the last of the short episodes--it clocks in at 29 minutes (bringing the show's tally up to 162 minus credits etc) [An interjection after I posted this: I leaned on Small Screen to do their research for this, but in doing it myself I've learned Lauder simply accepted a Facebook post at face value that linked an old Collider interview with Matt Shakman--all that's said there is confirmation by the director that the entire show is about six hours, which is not the same thing as three remaining longer episodes (Shakman actually refused to comment about episode length)]. It's a good episode, but not as strong as episode five (Evan Peters stands out with an excellent performance). At this point we're far enough into the show to make some general statements about what has worked and what hasn't.


The Good
The story and performances centered on Wanda and Vision in Westview are superb (even if the sitcom humour isn't always on target); the two actors have been fantastic, with the supporting cast doing a wonderful job (the only exception being Julian Hilliard's Wiccan, but that's a minor point). All have easily managed the transition back and forth between sitcom and drama, providing a strong backbone that spurs the show forward. Both Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany standout as the best performers on the show.


The Mediocre
Despite its importance to plot, everything with SWORD has been average, occasionally stooping to lazy for the sake of the plot. None of the performances hit the level of Westview, with Randall Park's Jimmy Woo as the strongest component (granting he's not being asked to do much and can't elevate the performances around him). Darcy has been surprisingly hit and miss and that's clearly down to the writing--she has inexplicable tonal shifts and lacks development. Teyonah Paris (Moncia) has been fine, but once removed from Westview hasn't been asked to show any range, so (like the rest of the actors here) is simply flat. It seems clear the writers were more interested in Westview and spent very little time fleshing out the SWORD characters.


The Bad
Josh Stamberg's Tyler Hayward is distractingly bad (a rare miss from casting director Sarah Finn)--dragging down the mediocre writing for SWORD as well as the performers around him. His performance is flat and uninteresting. His villainy--SWORD doing dastardly things (ala SHIELD in Winter Soldier)--comes across as cartoony because he poses no threat whatsoever to Wanda--he can't even effectively threaten the Woo trio, preventing him from adding tension to the situation (he's almost at Jacques Clouseau levels of incompetence). There's nothing wrong with the character type (he is, in many ways, a clone of Robert Redford's Alexander Pierce, but he lacks both the acting ability and the development to make for an interesting antagonist). We are blessed that he's almost certainly disposable and not our primary antagonist.


Monica Rambeau's Superhero Origin
Does the show successfully set-up Monica as a character to invest in? Not yet. She's been an adequate supporting character (more effective in Westview than out), but lacks dramatic tension and internal conflict (she just learned her mother died and it's had no impact on her whatsoever). This isn't a fatal flaw because it's not the Monica Rambeau show, but currently she's too one-dimensional--our only hint at depth being her surprising reaction to Carol Danvers. Functionally there's nothing separating her from Jimmy Woo, which is a problem (I suppose Jimmy has the leg-up because he can do card tricks). The show missed an easy point of conflict by giving her a past relationship with Hayward that would add tension to the SWORD scenes (granting that Stamberg probably can't make that work). One thing I'm very curious about is how the MCU will handle her power levels--there's been a lot of power creep and the universe is much more interesting when fewer characters can tackle Thanos easily (in terms of villain resolutions, Doctor Strange is one of the most satisfying--Strange can't defeat Dormammu, so has to outsmart him). The best heroes have to pay a price for what they do, and Monica's mother dying off-screen doesn't cut it--there is, however still time to sort that out.



Back to the Episode
The Westview story, particularly what we got from both Vision and Quicksilver (see below) was excellent. The low point remains the drama with SWORD (the trio getting kicked out is cartoonish and I'm not sure how/when Darcy became a hacker--I don't remember that being part of her character in the first two Thor films). I think--or at least hope--the ending of SWORD's containment will nudge that part of the story into a more interesting paradigm.


Quicksilver
Who is Evan Peters playing? On one level, the show is selling that he's playing the Aaron Taylor-Johnson iteration of the character (we see him riddled with bullets ala Age of Ultron), but I don't think we can take that at face value. Why is Quicksilver hyper aware of what's happening in the town when Vision is oblivious? Those two are the proper comparison, because they are the only dead characters who have reappeared. Vision can't even remember being a member of the Avengers, but not only does Quicksilver know his own past (to some extent at least--he dodges Wanda testing that fully), he knows that Vision died--how? We also have Pietro's easy acceptance of what Wanda is doing (holding thousands captive to participate in her Shangri-La). These oddities have me wondering if he's actually Nightmare or Mephisto--it would explain the hyper awareness, showing himself as dead to Wanda, and encouraging the continuance of the horror that the citizens of Westview are enduring. The show certainly needs an antagonist with the power to threaten Wanda (as opposed to the limp efforts of Hayward) to keep the dramatic tension high.


The Engineer
It looks like we'll finally meet Monica's aerospace engineer, who may or may not be impacted by the expanded hex zone (whether Darcy will be empowered by passing through it or not is unclear). The fan noise for the role is mostly Reed Richards (or Doctor Doom or even Beast), but I think K. C. Walsh's hint that it's the unremarkable Blue Marvel is more likely--that could be why so many scoopers are pushing for a character virtually no one has heard of (cf)--apparently he has a romance with Monica in the comics, which would give him relevance. On the positive side, we can dispense with the mundane option of it being the random Skrull that Monica befriended in Captain Marvel, not only because it appears this is a male character, but there's no reason to spend two episodes building up a reveal for a character no one remembers.


Lauder is claiming that Ultron will make an appearance in WandaVision. This is plausible speculation, since the show is heavily focused on dealing with Wanda's past trauma (it's not a unique idea, but none of the bigger scoopers have pushed it).


After the superbowl trailer dropped, Daniel claimed Erin Kellyman is playing a gender-swapped Flag-smasher (which turned out not to be a scoop by him, but rather something revealed via a toy leak). This represents another case of Murphy's speculation gone array (in October he believed Noah Mills had the role, which joins his twice wrongly speculated guesses over who was Songbird). I bring this up just to remind fans there's a big difference between what Murphy puts out as scoops versus his speculation.

We had a supposed leak on 4chan that, while almost certainly false, is at least restrained (this is long):
Trailers have shown almost nothing of the show. Everything in the trailers is from the first episode except Madripoor and the shot of Zemo with his mask in hand from the newest trailer (which is ironically from the last episode)
Therapy sessions are a bookend for the show, every episode starts/is intercut with them. Ross is watching. [Unclear if he means General Ross or Everett Ross]
Flagsmasher is not a major character, just a side character used by Zemo as a distraction. Show in general follows a villain of the week format with the exception of Zemo who is built across the 6 episodes.
Steve Rogers does not die (at least not in this show). There is a funeral, but it's for General Ross (he's not really dead, but going underground)
John Walker is referred to as Captain America throughout his run with the shield. At one point he is referred to in dialogue as "a US Agent" but that's it. He's not a full on villain, he genuinely wants what's best for the country but he follows orders to a fault and has crippling PTSD.
Race is a HEAVY theme in the show. Sam isn't allowed the shield because of the Sokovia Accords, but the real reason is because he is black. When Walker goes off the reservation and beats Eli Bradley in front of cameras, the government tries to give Sam the shield for good PR. This almost leads Sam to forsaking the government entirely but Rhodey brings him back. [I don't buy this at all--see below]
Show doesn't really set Rhodey up for Armor Wars at all.
Bucky's arc is atonement and becoming a human again in the small ways he can. Sharon helps him with this immensely. [I don't buy this either, as Civil War already encapsulates this--what the show seems to be doing is asking the question: who is Bucky now that he's no longer the Winter Soldier and Steve is gone?]
The 5 years after the snap are explored heavily, as is the impact of coming back to a changed world.
Omega Red [Desmond Chiam] and Batroc the Leaper are indeed in the show. They are the villains of episode 3, which is the Madripoor episode. Omega Red is pretty nerfed for the MCU but there's a canon reason. The word "mutant" is never said. [The Omega Red rumour goes back a year to Reddit]
Songbird does NOT appear. Neither do the Inhumans in any capacity. There's also no tie in to Black Widow, at least not one that I noticed. [The first and third are meant to address common assumptions about the show, but the middle point baffles me as I haven't heard them included in rumours]

Zemo's plan is to rid the world of superheros. He escaped and inspired people like Flagsmasher during the snap. He uses the events of WandaVision, John Walker's downfall, and the public uncertainty regarding the snap to radicalize an army.
Sam ends up begrudgingly accepting the role as Captain America but that's because he does it for himself.
Bucky and Sharon end up together. It works better than you think I promise. Sharon is a highlight of the show and one of the most capable characters.
Ross is trying to recreate the super solider serum again, which leads to Red Hulk. Last scene (not post credits, haven't seen that) is an intelligent Red Hulk approaching Zemo after Zemo has just been microchipped with a bomb in his neck to recruit him for Thunderbolts.
Bucky joins the new Shield with Sharon at the end. Sam seeks to reform the Avengers. [I'm doubtful of a reformed SHIELD--what's the point when you have SWORD and already gave SHIELD a full arc?]

Episode 1: details aftermath of Endgame, Sam relinquishes the shield to the government and John Walker, Flagsmashers are trying to steal bioweapon. With Sharon's help they stop them. Zemo revealed to be the villian
Episode 2: John Walker is sent after Zemo. Sam and Bucky continue to butt heads. The three of them have a fight and Zemo gets away. They come back together and catch Zemo
Episode 3. Captured Zemo leads them to Madripoor, they shake Walker in the streets. Batroc and Omega Red attack them in a bar. Zemo escapes on a speedboat, makes a public broadcast
Episode 4: Zemo followers rise up in the streets which leads to vigilantism. Patriot is the main focus. Him and Walker take on a gang together, but he intervenes to stop Walker from killing them and Walker brutalizes him. This was Zemo's plan. Sam meets with Rhodey to discuss being a black superhero [The poster has completely forgotten about Battlestar--you'll see his comment about him below--so has inserted Patroit, an obscure Young Avengers character no one has rumoured for the show]
Episode 5. Sam still refuses to accept the shield. Everyone gets a turn with it, including Sharon as they finish off the Flashsmasher gang. Walker tries to make amends
Episode 6. Sam accepts the role as Captain America. Him, Bucky, Sharon, Walker and Patriot suit up together and take on Zemo in his Alaskan shipping boat base where he plans to launch his bioweapon from [In general these summaries are much too vague to be authentic--no one summarizes like this--interesting moments stand out and get pointed at]

The meat of the show is over 6 months later [after Endgame]
Omega Red's design is I'd say 70% comic accurate, 30% tacticool like most MCU costume design. Unnecessary lines all over. The reveal of his tentacles is very cool though. Even with unfinished VFX
Thunderbolts are set up at the end. The Flashsmashers cult is a bit like the OG comic Thunderbolts visually and ability wise
Says he does not know why Patriot is appearing instead of Battlestar
Noah Mills plays one of the flag-smashers
Zemo kills Erin Kellyman's character
It's basically [Falcon's] show
Zemo does get a sword, but he doesn't use it until the last episode, and its just a vibranium arm [Presumably he means its made of the metal]
My main objection to this is how slight it is on details--what's described is too vague. I don't think Marvel would ever have one of their main characters (in this case, Ross) or the US military reject someone because of their race--the reason for the latter is because of their close relationship (I mentioned it last time in regards to how they dodged sexism in the military for Captain Marvel); the reason not to paint Ross with that brush is pretty obvious (and you'd also have to ask, why haven't we seen this character trait before?).


Tom Drew (The Direct; which, as we've gone over, gets their information from Daniel) says that Adam Hugill has joined the cast of Doctor Strange 2, likely playing the alien minotaur Rintrah who has magical abilities. This is a very obscure character and it will be interesting to see what we get if this is true.


Daniel posted a casting call for Black Panther 2 (verified by Murphy afterwards--in both cases this is from Production Weekly):
[ZYANYA]
Female, 20s-40s, Mayan. Fierce, cunning, a great warrior. Physical training or fight/dance experience is a plus. Strong Supporting role. [Daniel doesn't include it, but via Murphy writer Joseph Aberl, we know they are not restricting the search to just Mayans, but any indigenous person from the Americas--reminiscent of the broad net used to cast Kamala Khan]
[CADMAEL]
Male, 20s-40s, Mayan. 6'0" or taller. Powerful, strong, a loyal warrior and formidable presence. Any fight or stunts experience is a huge plus. Strong Supporting role. [Same stipulation as above]
No one has any clue who these characters are (they might be unique, but I doubt it--Marvel likes using source material--I think they are race-swapped). In terms of disparate connections, indigenous people from the Americas is pretty good. What this might be is a re-writing of Namor and his people--so using those with an indigenous background rather than the expected Asian swap. I'm speculating, but if I'm right, I feel like the decision to greenlight Shang-Chi impacted a lot of expected Asian swaps. The idea itself is an interesting one, because outside of Alpha Flight there aren't many notable indigenous characters in Marvel. Following this chain of logic, perhaps these characters are Namora (his cousin) or Namorita (another cousin) and someone like Llyron (granduncle, which may be too old, but a male relative is what I'm getting at)--ie, members of the Atlantean noble family. It's worth pointing out that it's been argued we're getting White Tiger rather than Namor in the film (cf), and that would suggest these characters are associated with him, but Hector Ayala is Hispanic with no known connection to the Mayans, so I'm doubtful. It will be interesting to see developments going forward, but colour me intrigued. (It would be interesting if a revived Killmonger provided weapons to the Mayans to fight the American-backed Mexican government for autonomy--think of the Zapatista uprising--but Marvel would never do that.)


Speaking of Daniel, he posted casting calls for She-Hulk's parents while intentionally obfuscating a third call for a character dubbed "Parker" (a 30s-40s male character who has a strong supporting role and is possible love interest). I don't know why Daniel didn't provide the full information for Parker, but I'm guessing that description will trickle out via one of his buddies elsewhere.


Skyler Shuler (DisInsider) says Keanu Reeves was approached by Sony for Kraven months ago but turned it down--food for thought.


I failed to mention in December that Dominique Thorne had been cast as Ironheart (I held off thinking we might get more news, but at this point it's time to discuss it). The casting is reminiscent of Iman Vellani for Ms. Marvel in that both are unknown and not actresses you'd expect to lead their own show--much riskier picks than Kate Bishop actress Hailee Steinfeld--I'm curious how they will be received.


For quite some time Sutton has suggested that Joss Whedon was under consideration for a few different Marvel IP (X-Men, Excalibur, and Agents of SWORD). This always seemed unlikely to me given his wife's revelations in conjunction with the Ray Fisher drama, but now that Charisma Carpenter has repeated her accusations with additional details (most of her costars coming out with either similar stories or in support), the MCU won't touch Whedon.

Assessing an Old Leak

Specifically I wanted to address one from early 2019 via 4chan, a leak thought to be authentic by both Murphy and Conrad. Before we go through it, let me point out that minor variations aren't concerning in terms of assessment, because this was posted nine months before any of the shows started filming.

WandaVision
Vision is reborn in Avengers: Endgame and reunites with Scarlet Witch. They attempt to lead normal lives in the suburbs of New York, but Vision is no longer connected to the Mind Stone and is therefore cold and emotionless. Scarlet Witch attempts to use her powers, which are connected to the Mind Stone, to restore Vision’s “soul”, with disastrous results. This project has been described as a “psychological thriller”, light on action and heavy on atmosphere, and exploring the lead characters’ personal issues. Vision will be in human form for most of it and become the antagonist, as Scarlet Witch slowly realizes she accidentally allowed a dark spirit to possess him. Agatha Harkness will be featured as a mysterious figure attempting to reveal to Scarlet Witch secrets of her past, and there will be a subplot about the public’s backlash against human/machine relations once the true nature of Vision and Scarlet Witch’s relationship is revealed. High-caliber actresses like Frances Conroy, Vanessa Redgrave and Dianne West have already been approached for Harkness.
While we still have up to half the runtime of the show to come, most of this seems to be wrong. The Tom King-element (rejection of their relationship by the public) isn't evident at all, there's no direct hint of Agatha reminding Wanda of her past, any sense that Vision will become a villain, and the tone hasn't hit the psychological thriller mark (its been mysterious, not frightening). If this was an idea at Marvel, it doesn't seem like something Jac Schaeffer would pitch. I suspect the entirety of this is wrong, but I can't be definitive about it yet. What this looks like to me is someone looking at the source material and making their best guess.

Falcon and the Winter Soldier
Falcon & The Winter Soldier will be deeply ingrained in the events of Phase 4, and features Falcon and Winter Soldier being recruited by SHIELD to prevent anarchist group Ultimatum from enforcing a secret plan developed by Hydra to destroy the United Nations. The duo must also deal with John Walker [aka U.S. Agent], a soldier recruited by the U.S. government to become the new Captain America, who slowly goes insane and becomes a threat. The project is described as a “spy thriller” with lots of twists and turns, and it relies heavily on Falcon and Bucky’s dynamic, in the same vein as Lethal Weapon or 48 Hours. Emily VanCamp's Sharon Carter will be the team’s contact with SHIELD, and Samuel L. Jackson will make appearances as Nick Fury. William Hurt is also in talks to appear as Secretary Thaddeus Ross
Besides using SHIELD rather than SWORD, much of this is plausible, although the description is vague beyond the specific plot against the UN. I'm dubious of the Hydra connection (a group that has had a full arc in the MCU already), and there's no mention of Zemo (who has a major role). Because of how ephemeral the description is, it's difficult to verify or debunk, but to me it looks like speculation.

Loki
Loki meets the Norns after his death in Avengers: Infinity War and must persuade them to spare his soul from Hel. Tom Hiddleston will appear in bookend scenes and narrate throughout, but the blunt of the story is about Loki’s youth and the events that led him down the path of evil, with a new actor playing young Loki. One name that has been frequently brought up is Fionn Whitehead from Dunkirk and Black Mirror: Bandersnatch. We will also see young Thor, and Rene Russo will have a big role as their mother FriggaOdin will be away on a mission for most of the story, and the few times he appears, his face will be obscured, with Anthony Hopkins ADR-ing the dialogue. The sorceress Karnilla and the barbarian Ulik will be the main antagonists.
The entirety of this is wrong--I'm extremely puzzled why the poster ignored the rather obvious escape by Loki in Endgame and chose the afterlife as his method of adventure. There's not much else to say about this, as it's clear Marvel was always going to use the 2012 Loki as the backdrop for the show.

Hawkeye
Early development. Pitched as a “caper” about Hawkeye coming out of retirement to help aspiring vigilante Kate Bishop after she gets in trouble with the organized crime while using his name. Hawkeye’s family would be heavily featured, and Linda Cardellini is willing to return, but Jeremy Renner is still studying his options. The Hood would be the main antagonist, with Trickshot as his enforcer.
The poster is correct about the source material being used (what else could you do with an aging Hawkeye originally intended to die in Endgame?), but he seems to have the orientation wrong (it's Kate's family that seems to be featured, not Clint's), so this smacks of speculation.

War Machine (Armor Wars)
Early development. Pitched as a “sci-fi thriller” about Colonel James Rhodes pushing the boundaries of his own humanity as he investigates the theft of Stark Industries’ technologies and uncovers a conspiracy masterminded by an elusive organization that is providing criminals and terrorists with cybernetic enhancements. Envisioned as a “deep dive” into War Machine’s often overlooked lore, introducing his sister Jeanette Rhodes, girlfriend Glenda Sandoval, and friends Suzi Endo and Jake Oh, with Parnell Jacobs and Stewart Clarke as villains. Limiting factors are the budget and Don Cheadle’s schedule.
We know so little about Armor Wars that it's difficult to comment on these predictions. One thing that's apparent is that Marvel understood that a War Machine-titled project was a dead end, so have leaned on a classic Iron Man story instead. As yet, however, we have no idea what the scope of the story is. Given that everything above seems like fan speculation, we can safely dismiss it.

Sif (Nothing on the slate)
Early development. Pitched as a “sidequel” about Lady Sif’s journey across the Nine Realms after being betrayed and exiled by Loki masquerading as OdinBeta Ray Bill would be featured as one of Lady Sif’s companions in her journey, and the Enchantress would be the main antagonist. Jamie Alexander is willing to return, but they are still figuring out a schedule that doesn’t conflict with her TV show Blindspot.
We have no evidence for this at all, although Sif (who was supposed to die in Ragnarok) is returning for Thor 4 (in what capacity we have no idea). Blindspot is no longer an issue, but Sif can't support her own show--alternatives like Thor Corps are possible, but that's just speculation. There is some evidence to support the idea that Marvel considered something for her at the time, because Discussing Film put out the idea prior to the 4chan post. However, if it was considered, it must not have been for very long, since there's no sign of it on the slate and Ms. Marvel, She-Hulk, Moon Knight, Secret Invasion, and Ironheart have already bypassed it. 

Other
These are the six projects in active development, but several other ideas are being discussed, like spin-offs about Rocket & GrootAgent 13 (aka Sharon Carter), Nebula and Okoye; prequels about Hank Pym and the Ravagers, and even new properties unlikely to get feature movies, like Moon Knight and The Sentry. There will probably be several X-Men projects once the rights fully revert later this year.
The Rocket & Groot idea was not new (Murphy talked about it previously), while most of the rest are ideas we can dismiss (Sharon Carter, Nebula, Ravagers, and a Hank Pym prequel are all DOA and unlikely to ever have been seriously considered). Okoye will probably be featured in the Wakanda show, but I'm not going to credit the poster for that since these are all being presented as solo vehicles. Moon Knight was one of the most heavily rumoured IP's for Marvel so without specifics, there's also no credit for including it. My belief is that the poster had no inside information--that what we see above is fan speculation (Murphy/Conrad seem to be crediting it simply because they liked the ideas).


I brought this up in my last post, but thought it worth repeating: Sutton has been revamping Geekosity and as part of that process reposting a ton of his old material. I find this odd and I'll be curious to see if he reposts the content that's already been debunked or if the cleansing will wipe that slate clean.


I mentioned awhile ago that it seems like WB is doing all it can to prevent Ava DuVernay from making New Gods. The director keeps committing to new projects and was recently announced to be helming a new one for the CW. This is the fourth she's taken since being announced as the director of New Gods, which means that film is far, far away. I think WB wants her to leave of her own accord rather than make the film--in part, no doubt, because the MCU is doing her film with The Eternals.

This article is written by Peter Levi (@eyeonthesens)